ATO announces changes to how penalty relief is applied
From 1 July 2018 the ATO says it will not apply penalties to tax returns and activity statements where you have made an inadvertent error by failing to take reasonable care or due to the fact that you have not taken a “reasonably arguable” position (more below).
It says that if it finds inadvertent errors in your tax return or activity statement, it will fix the error and contact the taxpayer (or the tax agent who lodged) to make sure the taxpayer is informed about how to get it right next time.
The ATO says its penalty relief applies to eligible individuals as well as entities with a turnover of less than $10 million. These entities can be:
Those not eligible for penalty relief include:
The ATO points out that no-one can apply for penalty relief — it will provide this during an audit if clients are eligible. If the ATO audits you for periods earlier than 1 July 2018, it says it will also apply penalty relief for those periods.
Relief from penalties also comes with a “reset” period, which means penalty relief will be available once every three years at most. Penalty relief is not available for example where, in the past three years, you have:
Penalty relief does not apply to other taxes such as fringe benefits tax (FBT) or the super guarantee (SG).
What is a reasonably arguable position?
The process for determining whether a position is “reasonably arguable” is explained to some degree in miscellaneous taxation ruling MT 2008/2. The ATO, in taxation ruling TR 94/5, states that: “Whether the taxpayer’s treatment was reasonably arguable would depend on its relative strength when compared with the Commissioner’s and other possible treatments. In other words, taxpayers should take particular note of the Commissioner’s views on the correct operation of the law as expressed in a public ruling, but may adopt alternative treatments provided there are sound reasons for doing so.”
A Treasury review of income tax self assessment found that “reasonably arguable” is only defined in general terms. This includes that “a position is reasonably arguable if it would be concluded in the circumstances, having regard to relevant authorities, that it is at least as likely to be correct as incorrect”.
The explanatory memorandum to the A New Tax System (Tax Administration) Act (No. 2) 2000 explains this concept further as follows: “The position must be a contentious area of the law, where the relevant law is unsettled or where, although the principles of the law are settled, there is a serious question about the application of those principles to the circumstances of the particular case.”
The EM further states that: “The strength of the taxpayer’s argument should be sufficient to support a reasonable expectation that the taxpayer could win in court. The taxpayer’s argument should be cogent, well-grounded and considerable in its persuasiveness.”
Disclaimer:
Hillyer Riches Management Pty Ltd , accountants and advisors located in Caulfield, is a Corporate Authorised Representative (No 466483) of Capstone Financial Planning Pty Ltd. ABN 24 093 733 969. AFSL / ACL No. 223135.This document contains general advice only and is not personal financial or investment advice. Also, changes in legislation may occur frequently. We recommend that our formal advice be obtained before acting on the basis of this information.
Dec 10, 2018
Aug 17, 2018
Aug 14, 2018
Aug 14, 2018
Aug 7, 2018
Aug 3, 2018
Aug 1, 2018
Jul 10, 2018
Jul 8, 2018
Jul 2, 2018
Jun 5, 2018
Mar 27, 2018
Mar 10, 2018
Jun 1, 2017
Nov 7, 2016
Nov 7, 2016
Sep 22, 2016
May 31, 2016
May 2, 2016
May 2, 2016
Dec 2, 2015
Dec 2, 2015
Aug 10, 2015
Aug 10, 2015
Jul 23, 2015
Jul 17, 2015
Jul 17, 2015
Jul 14, 2015
Jul 14, 2015
Jun 30, 2015
Jun 30, 2015
Jun 30, 2015
Jun 25, 2015
Jun 25, 2015
Jun 18, 2015
Jun 18, 2015
Jun 15, 2015
Jun 15, 2015
Jun 10, 2015
Jun 10, 2015
Jun 9, 2015
May 26, 2015
May 26, 2015
May 26, 2015
May 21, 2015
May 20, 2015
May 20, 2015
May 14, 2015
May 14, 2015
May 11, 2015
May 8, 2015
May 5, 2015
Apr 30, 2015
Apr 28, 2015
Apr 23, 2015
Apr 22, 2015
Apr 21, 2015
Apr 20, 2015
Apr 16, 2015
Apr 15, 2015
Apr 13, 2015
Mar 26, 2015
Mar 23, 2015
Mar 16, 2015
Mar 28, 2013
Mar 22, 2013
Mar 13, 2013
Feb 21, 2013
Feb 20, 2013
Feb 19, 2013
Feb 14, 2013
Feb 14, 2013
Jan 15, 2013
Jan 15, 2013
Nov 28, 2012
Nov 10, 2012
Nov 9, 2012
Oct 9, 2012
Sep 26, 2012
Sep 24, 2012
Sep 17, 2012
Sep 11, 2012
Sep 10, 2012
Sep 10, 2012
Sep 10, 2012
Sep 10, 2012
Sep 10, 2012
Sep 10, 2012
Sep 10, 2012
Sep 9, 2012
Sep 6, 2012
Aug 14, 2012
Aug 3, 2012
Jul 31, 2012
Jul 31, 2012
Jul 13, 2012
Jul 12, 2012
May 21, 2012
Apr 23, 2012
Apr 19, 2012
Apr 19, 2012
Apr 18, 2012
Jan 1, 1970
Sep 10, 0201